Blog Layout

Drug Testing and Employment

admin • May 18, 2021

Unfortunately notwithstanding the passage of Prop 64 (AUMA), the legalization of marijuana/cannabis in some instances, employers may still refuse to hire and fire persons that use marijuana/cannabis. California NORML has sponsored pending legislation, that will provide protections for patients from lose of   employment. 

Ross v. Raging Wire Telecom [42 Cal. 4th 920 (2008)]- CA Supreme Court ruled that an employer may terminate or deny employment by a private company to anyone who merely admits to using or who uses marijuana, even if they are a qualified medical marijuana patient. 

There is no constitutional protection from testing or for refusing a drug test unless one is employed by a governmental agency. Testing governmental employees has been struck down by courts  in many types of work except where the employee’s impairment could cause serious threat or harm, (i.e. a job as a train conductor). However, private employers may impose drug testing as a condition of employment, and if the  “dirty” employee can be fired.

Estimated lengths of time that marijuana use is detectable in the body by urine testing:  

Single Use: 5 days 

Double Use: 12-17 days 

Heavy Use: 15-35 days

An employee accused of having a positive drug test result should request a second independent laboratory test of the “dirty” sample. It has been reported that false positives can result from a number of reasons. False positives can force an employee into unnecessary rehabilitation programs or, even worse, result in an unwarranted firing. Firing a good employee is a loss to both parties. 

Note from Bruce: I am unaware of any chemical product that has proven effective in “cleansing” the system of  THC. Abstaining, exercising, and drinking a lot of water are the only proven ways to rid the body of THC. You may purchase an over-the-counter kit that detects THC from most drugstores to do a confidential test.  

EMPLOYERS NEED GUIDANCE: Employers should be informed and made to understand that the rational purpose for conducting drug testing is to determine whether or not an employee is impaired on the job. Since marijuana metabolite is detectable in urine for up to 35 days or more after use, its existence does not establish impairment.  The scientific community generally agrees that the effects of marijuana last no more than about three hours after use. 

Arguably, a more effective approach to ensure safety is to observe the employee’s on-the-job behavior and to administer motor skill tests similar to those used in DUI cases, or some form of written tests. This type of policy reduces the cost of testing, protects the privacy and morale of the employees, and is a more effective way to uncover an employee’s inability to perform his/her duties safely which could be for any number of reasons.  

High THC levels indicate recent use but do not necessarily indicate impairment. Zero tolerance laws incriminate many un-impaired drivers. 

The scientific basis for such laws is still being tested and remains unclear. There is no agreement on what threshold amount causes impairment; THC-COOH (Metabolites) has no bearing on impairment.  

Note from Bruce: Prop 64, passed in 2016, still has not changed the ability of employers to hire people who use  marijuana/cannabis, medically or otherwise, either through personal possession has been legalized of up to an  ounce (28.5 grams) 

Note from Bruce: Prop 65 provides $3,000,000 early to support scientific research to determine impairment  resulting from the use of all drugs both legal and controlled i.e. ADVIL PM and other prescription and nonprescription drugs 

By admin 20 May, 2021
Reductions and Dismissals of Prior Marijuana Felonies  As of November 8, 2016, with passage of Prop 64., it is now Legal to Possess (and Give) an ounce of Marijuana & 8 grams of Hashish; California Health & Safety Code § 11362.1, 11362.45;  LAW: POSSESSION, BY ADULTS OVER 21, OF AN OUNCE OR LESS OF MARIJUANA […] The post Possession of up to an ounce first appeared on The Law Offices Of Bruce M. Margolin, ESQ.
By admin 18 May, 2021
California Health & Safety Code § 11357;  Except as authorized by the law*, possession of not more than 28.5 grams of marijuana, or not more than four/ eight grams* of concentrated cannabis, or both, shall be punished or adjudicated as follows:  ALL ADULTS 21 OVER IN CALIFORNIA   LAW: POSSESSION OF OVER AN OUNCE OF MARIJUANA […] The post Possession of Over an Ounce first appeared on The Law Offices Of Bruce M. Margolin, ESQ.
By admin 18 May, 2021
California Health & Safety Code § 11359 b MISDEMEANOR LAW: POSSESSION FOR SALE IS A MISDEMEANOR UNDER MOST   CIRCUMSTANCES: To sell means to exchange any amount of marijuana or  hashish for anything of value. Note that “giving away” up to an ounce of marijuana  is legal in the State of California involving adults over the age of […] The post Possession for Sale first appeared on The Law Offices Of Bruce M. Margolin, ESQ.
A yellow smiley face with brown eyes and a smile on it.
By admin 18 May, 2021
California Health & Safety Code §11362.2 & §11358 Misdemeanor /Felony  LAW: Cultivation of up to 6 live plants of Marijuana is legal per residence for adults  over 21; and you may posses whatever amounts have been previously grown, and  harvested (also in the residence).  Note from Bruce: You may want to keep the root-balls as evidence that […] The post Cultivation first appeared on The Law Offices Of Bruce M. Margolin, ESQ.
By admin 18 May, 2021
Vehicle Code 23152e CA  PROP 64 DID NOT AMEND OR CHANGE LAWS REGARDING MARIJUANA DUI PROSECUTION   LAW: Even though possession of Marijuana is legalized, it remains unlawful to drive while under  the influence of marijuana or any drug if impaired to the degree that one is unable to operate a  motor vehicle safely.  PENALTY: For […] The post Driving Under the Influence (DUI) When Impaired first appeared on The Law Offices Of Bruce M. Margolin, ESQ.
By admin 18 May, 2021
California Health & Safety Code §11470(e) Forfeiture laws allow state and federal governments to seize money and property that  are proceeds of, or are used to, facilitate illicit drug activity. Forfeiture proceedings are  usually filed separately from the criminal case in which the “defendant” is the money  or property itself. The owner must file a […] The post Forfeiture of Money and Property first appeared on The Law Offices Of Bruce M. Margolin, ESQ.
By admin 18 May, 2021
11357(b) H&S (And Save Your Driver’s License While Doing So)  Note from Bruce: Under California law, anyone younger than 21 years old who is convicted of a marijuana offense will lose his/her driver’s license for one year, even if the offense is not driving related; this is subject to the discretion of the Judge.   DEFERRED […] The post How to Avoid a Marijuana Possession Conviction for 18-21 Years of Age first appeared on The Law Offices Of Bruce M. Margolin, ESQ.
By admin 18 May, 2021
California Health & Safety Code §11361.5 Removing and   Expungement (PC §1203.4 ) of your Marijuana Conviction   California law requires all governmental agencies to automatically destroy any records of marijuana possession  charges and any records of charges for giving away or transporting up to one ounce of marijuana two years after  the date of conviction or […] The post Destruction of Arrest and Conviction Records first appeared on The Law Offices Of Bruce M. Margolin, ESQ.
By admin 18 May, 2021
PC §1000 & 100.94 (LA County) Charges for the possession of marijuana or hashish and for the cultivation of  marijuana for personal use can be dismissed through successful completion of  Deferred Entry of Judgment. DEJ is not applicable to charges involving possession  for sale or transportation unless the marijuana is for personal use. The defendant  must plead guilty to […] The post Deferred Entry of Judgment (DEJ) = Dismissal first appeared on The Law Offices Of Bruce M. Margolin, ESQ.
By admin 18 May, 2021
California Penal Code § 1210  California law mandates drug treatment instead of incarceration for the possession and for transportation of  marijuana and other drugs for personal use. The defendant is eligible for a drug treatment program even after  conviction, unlike Deferred Entry of Judgment which must be taken before trial. The program can require  numerous […] The post Proposition 36 Alternative Drug Treatment Program first appeared on The Law Offices Of Bruce M. Margolin, ESQ.
More Posts
Share by: